Reviewers evaluate the manuscripts according to the following criteria:

  • is within the scientific domain of the journal;
  • significance of the topic;
  • thoroughness of the abstract;
  • state and formulation of the problem;
  • formulated aim/aims;
  • approaches and methods used;
  • presentation and analysis of the results;
  • quality of the illustrative material;
  • logically presented text and well justified conclusion;
  • presence of new results and contribution;
  • possibilities for practical application;
  • citing and referencing according to the requirements set by the journal.

 

For their convenience reviewers are given a unified Form of article reviewing, which is accompanied by a text containing comments and recommendations to the author/authors.

 

 

Form of Article Reviewing

(mark with a “v” in the respective column)

 

Title:

 

Type pf publication

Scientific article

 

Scientific review article

 

Scientific report

 

Another type (to be specified)

 

Evaluation by criteria

Good

Satisfactory

Poor

is within the scientific domain of the journal

 

 

 

Significance of the topic

 

 

 

Thoroughness of the abstract

 

 

 

State and formulation of the problem

 

 

 

Formulated aim/aims

 

 

 

Approaches and methods used

 

 

 

Presentation and analysis of the results

 

 

 

Quality of the illustrative material

 

 

 

Logically presented text and well justified conclusion

 

 

 

Presence of new results and contribution

 

 

 

Possibilities for practical application

 

 

 

Citing and referencing according to the requirements set by the journal.

 

 

 

Recommendations

To be published:

 

-       Without changes

 

-       After corrections

 

To be returned for rewriting and submitting again

 

Not to be published because:

 

-       It does not meet the requirements

 

-       Is not within the scientific domain of the journal

 

 

Reviewer:

Copyright © 2018 Industrial management. All Right Reserved.
Powered By Joomla Perfect